The aim
The aim is to alert on the most interesting classes of variable
objects so that follow-ups using ground-based telescopes can begin.
This includes supernovae, microlensing events, near-Earth asteroids,
novae, stars undergoing rare and interesting phases of evolution (such
as helium flash), and so on. Every class of object will require an
individual trigger.
The number of alerts
A prototype built with Self-Organizing Maps
SOMs are a powerful way to take a quick-look at the data. They
provide a broad brush clustering of the main types of pattern very
quickly. They are ideal for Petabyte datasets (like GAIA). This is
because they are fast, unsupervised and make no prior assumptions
about the data.
SOMs are a powerful way of implementing novelty detection. The number
of nodes is roughly the number of distinct classes and is always much
smaller than the number of different patterns. The nodes represent
the most abundant patterns. If a pattern is rare, then necessarily
there will be no node allocated near to it. So, such patterns are
identifiable through their large ``quantisation error''. Cuts on
the quantisation error and the signal-to-noise ratio can
substantially reduce the amount of data. This may already be enough
to identify the high-quality discrepant patterns on which we
wish to alert.
- Every 6 hours, a SOM is built from the GAIA datstream. The
discrepant patterns are extracted with cuts on signal-to-noise and
quantization error. Also extracted are the common patterns corresponding to
known types of variable stars.
- The discrepant patterns are cross-checked against a catalogue
of known stellar variables. Some of the stellar variables
can be pre-loaded from existing surveys of variable stars (such
as those available from the microlensing surveys). This catalogue
however will be incomplete at the beginning of the mission and
so will need to be up-dated every 6 hours with new variables
identified by the SOM.
- If the discrepant patterns are not in the catalogue of variable
stars, then they are candidates for alerts and need to be looked at
very closely. It may be that there is already enough confidence that
the object needs ground-based follow-up to issue an alert. It may be
that further tests are needed for specific classes of object.
More on lightcurve classification with SOMs
|